I’m just assuming the OP is looking for a general advise on a new TV. If he’s actually looking for a 20 inch TV he is looking for such a niche device that he should probably have stated that.

But OP stated no real requirements at all which makes it nearly impossible to actually recommend something. What even is the TV used for? He wants a non-smart TV but but seems to be streaming? What about size? How is the room lit?

A non-4K TV in 2024? Good luck with that. Just take one, it doesn’t hurt when your content is lower res, but you can still benefit from it when you play videogames or watch 4K Blu-Rays. I would definitely take an OLED display. Check out https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/best/tvs-on-the-market

But testing… Is that really necessary?

But is this comment really an answer to this question or just a rant about Canonical?

I actually criticize the community’s high interest in a screenshot for a stupid hardware survey.

This low effort content is the 2nd most upvoted post in this sub in the last month?

Isn’t like every bigger gaming news posted over 100 times on different communities and instances over a period of multiple days, not even including all the reposts of every different gaming outlet?

Nah, only the transactions will be bigger. Amount of content won’t.

Watching the trailer gave me the impression as well. Of course Pokemon are based on real life animals, but they also a lot of unique designs. No way they made pals by accident that look like Hatterene and Garchomp but different colors.

What I don’t get is why this article is so shit. Can’t be that hard to let someone who played the latest Pokemon games install Palworld and make some comparisons themsevels instead of just sharing some Twitter posts. OK, actually in get it. That’s how modern videogame journalism works.

I’m pretty sure we do know