Sure, but the ailment of our time is not immigrants. It’s wealth inequality, it’s 1% enriching themselves at the expense of everyone else, it’s unchecked self-destructive capitalism.

Rich people are the problem, not immigrants. And it’s lie and propaganda that drove people to believe otherwise.

That’s just not true. They are radicalized by lies, propaganda and the hate spread by right wing grifters.

deleted by creator

People want validations and to believe what they are doing is the right thing. When one side calls them evil, far-right, and racists, naturally they will flock to the other side who are telling them they are heroes who are protecting the country from immigrants.

You can watch street interviews of the protesters and you’ll see what I mean.

i don’t know. i might have a dark sense of humor, or maybe i am just a bad person, so the world goes to shit is somewhat amusing to watch. which is a terrible thing to say, because so so many people will be/is suffering because of all this.

Huh, that’s a new one. Couldn’t find any windows or stairs or something?

Truly a bastion of free speech

I agree, but let me steelman their argument a little bit: they aren’t necessarily saying a leftwing person killed Kirk, they could be pointing out how many leftwingers are celebrating Kirk’s death.

And I’ll counter that argument with, it’s not automatically immoral to celebrate some deaths. Like, most people celebrated when Hitler died.

It’s the right who are mongering hate, the left just hates those who are hate-able. It’s not “hate-mongering” to hate Adolf Hitler, or to hate a serial killer, or a dictator, or someone who’s a piece of shit. That’s called being human.

To be a hate-monger, you would have to lie, to manipulate the narrative, and to propagandize with the intention to drive hate. I don’t think the left is doing that.

I wonder how they are going to spin this one. It was “a cigarette butt igniting things on the ship”. Then the video came out, they started claiming “there’s a video of people on the ship misfiring a flare that fell back”, and they never fucking show the video.

I get so mad. I have my own two eyes and a wrinkled brain, and I get quite upset when people assume otherwise.

Leaving aside the questions whether it would benefit us, what makes you think LLM won’t bring about technical singularity? Because, you know, the word LLM doesn’t mean that much… It just means it’s a model, that is “large” (currently taken to mean many parameters), and is capable of processing languages.

Don’t you think whatever that will bring about the singularity, will at the very least understand human languages?

So can you clarify, what is it that you think won’t become AGI? Is it transformer? Is it any models that trained in the way we train llms today?

Well, you described pretty well what llms were trained to do. But from there you can’t derive how they are doing it. Maybe they don’t have real knowledge, or maybe they do. Right now literally no one can definitively claim one way or the other, not even top of the field ML researchers. (They may have opinions though)

I think it’s perfectly justified to hate AI, but it’s better to have a less biased view of what it is.

Okay, I am discombobulated, you have discombobulated me. What was the point you were arguing for? Obviously I wasn’t getting it.

yeah?? nobody’s saying it’s not?? so you are saying we need to protect the immigrants and give them more support? I’m all for that.

One of the studies you cited is about asylum-seeking women being sexually assaulted after arriving in France…

Have you just searched for “migrants sexual violence” and linked whatever you can find without reading them…

I generally don’t, even when I am dead wrong - it was my opinion and I was an idiot, no need to hide away from my past mistakes.

But I do delete my posts when I, for example, completely misunderstand what the OP is talking about, so I’m not adding anything to the conversation.

Duopolies are very prevalent in tech, think AMD/Intel, AMD/nvidia, Windows/MacOS, iOS/Android, etc.

As to why? idk. Big companies buy up small ones until one left so they don’t get sued for being a monopoly? Maybe, but I don’t think that applies to all those cases.

NixOS is the dad and the son? Literally God

And it’s kinda funny to see it breaks so many people’s brain.

Is it really so complicated to support them suing UK over OSA, without supporting the sites themselves?

I am not paying for this :)

you shouldn’t either