It has about the same capabilities as a normal phone , is better in a a few niche uses, but is much more fragile and costs double. What, are you not sold?

Why are you like this

The wise thing is to not offer perpetual licenses in the first place. You can’t predict the state of your business in 10 years let alone beyond that. Why make commitments that? Marketing of course. So if they’re going to raise capital that way (by one-time revenue from sales of perpetual licenses) then they can’t just decide that perpetual doesn’t mean perpetual anymore. All in all this will come down to a legal duel between expensive legal teams.

Some people are able to understand context.

Given the state of Xitter, I would argue that his control of Starlink is significantly more dangerous.

You couldn’t even refute those idiotic points properly.

My brother in Christ, they invented paper, fireworks, and the compass.

True. And irrelevant.

Because they developed more efficient engineering techniques and more advanced methods of industrial scale production. In the same way Japan ate the American auto industry’s lunch during the 80s and 90s by investing heavily in industry and education, China is flooding the zone with talented professionals and capital improvement projects.

And because the Chinese government is heavily subsidizing their auto industry in order to gain market share works wide. Pros for us: if we can buy these cars, the Chinese government is essentially subsidizing them for our consumers. Cons for us: without equivalent subsidies domestic car companies can’t possibly compete. There are genuine issues of trade fairness in play here.

The Chinese middle class is the largest in the world.

Relevant only if the Chinese middle class is who is working in those car factories. Is that the case?

I’m not even saying the tarrifs are good or bad. If they’re explicitly time boxed and our governments are able to stick to that deal, then they could be good. But in general tarrifs on EVs during a climate crisis driven by carbon emissions is explicitly counterproductive.

Because they make it easy and do a few cool things.

“Do you want a mic in your home that can record everything you say and do and send that data off to wherever the company chooses?”

“No of course not.”

“What about of it will also turn your lights on and off and play despacito on demand?”

“You son of a bitch, sign me up”.

They’re not being actively held hostage in that there’s no giant prison with all their families in it.

They are being held hostage because of the implication. The whereabouts of their family is well known so are they going to toe the line? Of course, because of the implication.

The fact that this tweet caused their stock price to dive really shows what a joke the stock market is .

Your comments is literally just ad-hominem too bruh.

The part where that matters. Your discourse is directly counterproductive to your stated goal.

If you cared about genocide more than how you look, you might actually say or do something productive towards stopping it

You can keep denying the truth of what you’ve proven all you want. You know your conclusion is nonsense.

This is vibes-based. The DNC will not cease support for Israel because the US State needs it for its Imperialist ambitions.

They can be made to cease unconditional support for Israel which is the only reason Israel has no incentive to work for peace.

Why do you believe organizing and building outside pressure has zero chance of success?

Probably because you and you guys have never provided a plausible possibility for how that would happen?

Why do you think the DNC will magically work against their material interests?

Unconditional support for Israel can be made to be against the DNC’s interests. But you have no interest in that. You just make noise.

Moral implications is actually the only outcome of voting in the US. BTW , when the situation in Gaza actually gets better, remember that this genocide was directly facilitated by people like you.

The only productive thing you’ve done is prove the opposite of that. You did by accident, but you did it.

There is significant anti-genocide faction within the democratic party that is trying to change things from within. There is nothing like that within the GOP. The only way to stop this (and the broader unconditional support of Israel) is through the democratic party. However small you think the chances of success of that strategy, leftists offer literally zero alternative paths to this outcome that have any chance of success.

It’s incredible that I had to chew this up and serve it on the platter before you could wrap your head around my point

Have you tried actually writing well?

You’re right that there is no solution to the problem in Gaza because it turns out that Americans are perfectly fine to let genocide continue and will do nothing about it. Glad we’re on the same page.

Cool thanks for proving that voting doesn’t have any moral implications on the situation in Gaza at all, so you all your noise can be safely ignored. BTW , when the situation in Gaza actually gets better, remember that you did absolutely nothing of any consequence.

Leftists have no solutions on Gaza. They just make noise. “Don’t vote for anyone who can win and change things” isn’t a solution and anyone who isn’t a child understands that .

No it’s not. Just more bullshit which is all you’re good for.

Yes, thanks for finally making a coherent point. You care deeply about internal US politics almost to the exclusion of all else. Your comments about “not caring about US internal politics” was transparently bullshit, and you have absolutely no solution to solve any problem, let alone the plight of Gaza. Glad we’re on the same page.