Daft_ish@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 1 year agoThey use to tell us we couldnt trust Wikipedia. Now we know. Wikipedia is the only website you can trust.message-squaremessage-square333fedilinkarrow-up11.2Karrow-down1122
arrow-up11.08Karrow-down1message-squareThey use to tell us we couldnt trust Wikipedia. Now we know. Wikipedia is the only website you can trust.Daft_ish@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square333fedilink
minus-squareMetz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down3·1 year agoyeah, apart from the admins that have absolute authority over everything and can do whatever the hell they want and make up arbitrary rules that disqualify your perfectly valid sources.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·1 year agothat doesn’t happen
minus-squareemergencyfood@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoThere definitely are editors who game the rules. And they are enough of a problem that sometimes rules need to be modified specifically to handle them.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 year agoyou seem to be conflating editors with admins.
minus-squareemergencyfood@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoAdmins are a subgroup of editors. As more senior members, they should behave more responsibly. But some don’t.
yeah, apart from the admins that have absolute authority over everything and can do whatever the hell they want and make up arbitrary rules that disqualify your perfectly valid sources.
that doesn’t happen
There definitely are editors who game the rules. And they are enough of a problem that sometimes rules need to be modified specifically to handle them.
you seem to be conflating editors with admins.
Admins are a subgroup of editors. As more senior members, they should behave more responsibly. But some don’t.