You’d think a hegemony with a 100-years tradition of upkeeping democracy against major non-democratic players, would have some mechanism that would prevent itself from throwing down it’s key ideology.

Is it really that the president is all that decides about the future of democracy itself? Is 53 out of 100 senate seats really enough to make country fall into authoritarian regime? Is the army really not constitutionally obliged to step in and save the day?

I’d never think that, of all places, American democracy would be the most volatile.

  • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    not true. congress could definitely remove the president… they just won’t do it because they’re too fascist themselves….

    • clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      But isn’t it depressing that impeachment is the ONLY mechanism to make a sitting president accountable for decisions that actually harm the country?

      • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        sorta… well what’s depressing is our two party system, and party loyalty, makes it almost impossible for it to happen… and no voters actually care about holding congress accountable