The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 个月前Select a tiplemmy.worldimagemessage-square260fedilinkarrow-up1794arrow-down130
arrow-up1764arrow-down1imageSelect a tiplemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 个月前message-square260fedilink
minus-squareAwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.workscakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down2·edit-25 个月前Would you like a legit source? I found it in 10 seconds of googling, btw.
minus-squaremelvisntnormal@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·5 个月前Similar interface, different values. Not to say that the one in the article isn’t absolutely egregious as well though, so my point only really matters if you care about OP’s image specifically.
minus-squareAwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.workscakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 个月前They both top out at 100%, which is what everybody in the thread is disputing for some reason.
minus-square.Donuts@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 个月前I reverse image searched on mobile to try find the origin / source of this specific image to see if it was legit. I wasn’t excluding the possibility of some company in the world prompting for a 100% tip, hence why I didn’t spend 10 seconds googling for it.
Would you like a legit source? I found it in 10 seconds of googling, btw.
Similar interface, different values. Not to say that the one in the article isn’t absolutely egregious as well though, so my point only really matters if you care about OP’s image specifically.
They both top out at 100%, which is what everybody in the thread is disputing for some reason.
I reverse image searched on mobile to try find the origin / source of this specific image to see if it was legit.
I wasn’t excluding the possibility of some company in the world prompting for a 100% tip, hence why I didn’t spend 10 seconds googling for it.