• yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The money in AI is going to be the wages of the people it replaces. Those tech billionaires call it a revolution because getting labor without wages is the promised land for cunt billionaires.

    The AI revolution is here because that’s what the owners want. If you think they’ll wait until the AI is as good as humans to replace humans I’ll point out that self-checkout already exists.

    • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The big problem here is that it’s simply not reliable enough to replace a worker because you have to have the AI running unsupervised to actually replace anyone and it can’t be done with the current technology and something that can actually replace workers is not coming in the next 5 years or so and I’m being generous.

    • leisesprecher@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Thing is, it doesn’t replace workers. And it won’t for the foreseeable future. Even Microsoft itself had to admit that their studies show AI assisted coding to be bad and making developers worse.

      There is hardly any market where these systems can reasonably compete with exploited humans. It’s just that the tech bros have nothing left to invest in. The same idiots that pushed crypto, NFTs and the Metaverse are now pushing for AI. There is hardly any innovation anymore, so the only ways to make line go up are rent seeking and investing in bubbles in the desperate attempt, that something might stick.

      • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It seems like we have a problem where there’s too much money at the top of society that’s trying to chase returns that can’t exist because there’s enough money at the bottom to buy products, so it just gets invested in bad ways. This will probably continue until they waste enough for their own money on bullshit that they no longer have it

        • leisesprecher@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          You’re right in your analysis, but the prediction is wrong, I’m afraid.

          The next “big thing” is taking over the government. See Musk and his gang. He’s not alone and the US isn’t the only country this is happening in. Corporations inject themselves into each and every transaction, every aspect of life and politics. That way they have essentially infinite money at their hands.

      • polographer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Not actually to discredit you, but I really would love to send some studies to some people I work; by any chance do you have the links to Microsoft studies

        • leisesprecher@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Translation on a level an AI could do is already pretty cheap, nobody’s gonna throw a nuanced legal document at an AI and rely on it.

          Junior devs are much smarter than any current AI, because they know what they want to achieve and why. There’s a reason why all the demos are toy examples. Actual code is messy and full of quirks because of weird requirements.

          • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Junior devs are much smarter than any current AI, because they know what they want to achieve and why

            Oh sweet summer child