• tias@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    18 hours ago

    As an experienced software dev I’m convinced my software quality has improved by using AI. More time for thinking and less time for execution means I can make more iterations of the design and don’t have to skip as many nice-to-haves or unit tests on account of limited time. It’s not like I don’t go through every code line multiple times anyway, I don’t just blindly accept code. As a bonus I can ask the AI to review the code and produce documentation. By the time I’m done there’s little left of what was originally generated.

    • gruhuken@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      If a bot can develop your software better than you then you’re a shit software dev

      • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        That’s not what is happening. The bot writes code and then I tell it what to change until it’s close enough, then I make the final touches myself. It’s like having a junior programmer do the grunt work for you.

    • _cnt0@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      As an experienced software dev I’m convinced my software quality has improved by using AI.

      Then your software quality was extreme shit before. It’s still shit, but an improvement. So, yay “AI”, I guess?

      • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        That seems like just wishful thinking on your part, or maybe you haven’t learned how to use these tools properly.

        • _cnt0@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Na, the tools suck. I’m not using a rubber hammer to get woodscrews into concrete and I’m not using “AI” for something that requires a brain. I’ve looked at “AI” suggestions for coding and it was >95% garbage. If “AI” makes someone a better coder it tells more about that someone than “AI”.

          • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            Then try writing the code yourself and ask ChatGPT’s o3-mini-high to critique your code (be sure to explain the context).

            Or ask it to produce unit tests - even if they’re not perfect from the get go I promise you will save time by having a starting skeleton.

            Another thing I often use it for is ad hoc transformations. For example I wanted to generate constants for all the SQLSTATE codes in the PostgreSQL documentation. I just pasted the table directly from the documentation and got symbolic constants with the appropriate values and with documentation comments.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      14 hours ago

      As an experienced software dev, I know better than to waste my time writing boilerplate that can be vomited up by an LLM, since somebody else has already written it and I should just use that instead.