• SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    She was born as a woman and she considers herself a woman

    You are conflating sex and gender, she has 5α-reductase deficiency which exclusively effects individuals with an XY karyotype.

    Either all women1, including Semenya, fall under that umbrella or none of them do. Pick one.

    If your concern is about “unfair advantages gained via doping” then the majority of trans women competing are being much more fair because they are undergoing HRT to bring the “doping” back to within the typical woman baseline.

    Unless your moral outrage is because you’re drawing a distinction between naturally occuring and artificial doping?

    ^1 I should have to fucking say this, but based on the fact we’re having this conversation: this inherently includes trans women.^

    • teslasaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      If your concern is about “unfair advantages gained via doping” then the majority of trans women competing are being much more fair because they are undergoing HRT to bring the “doping” back to within the typical woman baseline.

      This is the issue at hand. How can you possibly justify reverse doping when none is allowed? This introduction of alteration that isn’t and can’t be available for everyone is inherently unfair. It also is troublesome in the opposite direction. What is then the legal limit for doping of a trans male? Can they take as much as they want since it’s part of their condition?

      • SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        alteration that isn’t and can’t be available for everyone

        That’s unfortunately how genetics works.

        What is then the legal limit for doping of a trans male?

        I thought being assigned female at birth made someone inherently and irreversibly weaker and so they would be non-competitive in men’s sports /s.

        Seriously though that’s a largely solved problem. While specifics will vary depending on the specific org this set of guidelines outlined by the World Anti-Doping Agency is a decent enough framework and directly answers that.

        • teslasaur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          That’s unfortunately how genetics works.

          That’s fair. Changing it by medication or doping isn’t.

          I thought being assigned female at birth made someone inherently and irreversibly weaker and so they would be non-competitive in men’s sports /s.

          I gave it as an example for you to understand the position. Clearly it didn’t work.

          There is no example of a trans male winning against the best men in competition. Just the other way around. But then again we haven’t tested how far people might go in their roiding.

          • SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Define your goalposts, what exactly is “winning against the best in competition”?

            Chris Mosier seems like someone who consistently does win in those competitions.

            If he doesn’t count then who, specifically, does “the other way around”?

            • teslasaur@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              winning against the best in competition

              It’s axiomatic. The best means the best. Objectively. Fastest, highest, longest, game won. You understand?

              Chris Mosier seems like someone who consistently does win in those competitions.

              Participating in the Olympics, only to not even finish isn’t exactly winning though.

              I could find one victory in total, which was a smaller size meet for men over 40. Truly the best. Not bashing effort in any way, he likely puts in a lot of work. All athletes do.

              • SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                23 hours ago

                It’s axiomatic. The best means the best. Objectively. Fastest, highest, longest, game won.

                So your goalpost is a world record? No trans, non-binary, etc. individual I can find has set a world record in any sport.

                Participating in the Olympics, only to not even finish isn’t exactly winning though.

                If we lower the goalpost to ‘any trans, non-binary, etc. individual winning gold in the Olympics’ again nobody meets that criteria1. Dropping it to simply medaling? Again nothing.

                ^1 Quinn the soccer player arguably does meet this criteria, but it’s a team sport. Using that as your sole evidence of ‘loads of examples of the opposite’ seems extremely cherry picked doesn’t it?^

                • teslasaur@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  So your goalpost is a world record? No trans, non-binary, etc. individual I can find has set a world record in any sport.

                  Yeah? No shit they haven’t, born men aren’t allowed to compete against women. I recon there are thousands of athletes that could decide to transition to female and beat the world records for women.

                  • SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    8 hours ago

                    They are though, just going through the last 2 Olympics the list of openly trans individuals: Laurel Hubbard, Chelsea Wolfe, Quinn, Ness Murby, Nikki Hiltz, Raven Saunders.

                    You can look these things up, stop being a willfully ignorant bigot.