We are just finding out about a child sex trafficking ring involving politicians and billionaires, the world’s richest man does a Nazi salute at a political rally, and the President being an adjudicated sex criminal is probably not the worst thing he has done…

Meanwhile I’m standing here in the checkout line feeling guilty about whether or not I should tip a barista

Something is wrong with our collective notion of morality, and my individual understanding (Oh well, here we are)

  • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.todayEnglish
    101·
    1 day ago

    Considering the idea of shame is society’s way to enforce it’s version of morality, I would argue no it is not a distinction.

    • benni@lemmy.world
      3·
      10 hours ago

      Like you said, society’s version of morality. So it can be a very important distinction because your own version of morality might differ. Not being aware of this distinction is dangerous because it stops people from developing their own moral compass. This own morality is more firm and can be relied on in the absence of shame, or even when society encourages behavior one finds immoral.

      I’m even gonna go on a wilder speculation here and claim that one of the driving factors behind humanity’s worst atrocities was that large portions of society who had the potential in them for a firm morality rooted in empathy and love never developed this potential.

      On a less import note, not being aware of this distinction can breed a lot of resentment and unhappiness, if someone is constantly compelled to follow rules that they, deep down, consider to be bullshit.

      Of course that doesn’t mean I encourage people to just disregard society’s version of morality and lightly assume that they know better.

      Edit: just noticed your username, I hope that furriosa is doing well <3

    • zeca@lemmy.ml
      51·
      1 day ago

      Considering that drinking coffee is my prefered kind of laxative, i would argue theres actually no distinction between coffee and shit.