But invade they did and got their part. As agreed.
Why not fully agree to joint-invasion in a secret section of the pact?
They didn’t agree to an invasion in the pact, that’s why.
It doesn’t really answer the question of what benefit there would’ve been to “fully agree to joint-invasion” when they got everything they wanted to out of the pact with the postponed invasion
They got their part, as agreed. That much is just a fact. Same for the invasion happening. As for a coordinated attack, no such thing, but joint attack in the sense that both were attacking Poland at the same time.
There was no agreement to invade or divide Europe.
No agreement to divide Europe…?
Secret protocol
In the event of a territorial and political rearrangement in the areas belonging to the Baltic States (Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), the northern boundary of Lithuania shall represent the boundary of the spheres of influence of Germany and the U.S.S.R. In this connection the interest of Lithuania in the Vilna area is recognized by each party.
In the event of a territorial and political rearrangement of the areas belonging to the Polish state the spheres of influence of Germany and the U.S.S.R. shall be bounded approximately by the line of the rivers Narew, Vistula, and San.
The question of whether the interests of both parties make desirable the maintenance of an independent Polish state and how such a state should be bounded can only be definitely determined in the course of further political developments.
In any event both Governments will resolve this question by means of a friendly agreement.
With regard to Southeastern Europe attention is called by the Soviet side to its interest in Bessarabia. The German side declares; its complete political disinterestedness in these areas.
No, they agreed to spheres of influence. It’s one thing to agree that, in a coming war, neither party will cross said lines, and it’s another entirely to make that a binding agreement to invade all of Europe together. You jumped from point A not to B, but to Z, making up a bunch of assumptions that have no logical basis in between.
They divided Europe into those spheres of influence, resulting in Germans taking over parts of Poland, Soviet Union taking over Baltics, parts of Poland, Bessarabia, areas such as those given to it in the pact.
But invade they did and got their part. As agreed.
It doesn’t really answer the question of what benefit there would’ve been to “fully agree to joint-invasion” when they got everything they wanted to out of the pact with the postponed invasion
They did not agree to invade, and had no economic incentive to do so. You have no evidence for either.
They got their part, as agreed. That much is just a fact. Same for the invasion happening. As for a coordinated attack, no such thing, but joint attack in the sense that both were attacking Poland at the same time.
There was no agreement to invade or divide Europe. You have produced 0 evidence of this.
No agreement to divide Europe…?
Secret protocol
Also this treaty: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German–Soviet_Boundary_and_Friendship_Treaty
There’s nothing in there supporting a Soviet desire for invasion.
It’s literally spelling out how they’re dividing Europe lol
No, they agreed to spheres of influence. It’s one thing to agree that, in a coming war, neither party will cross said lines, and it’s another entirely to make that a binding agreement to invade all of Europe together. You jumped from point A not to B, but to Z, making up a bunch of assumptions that have no logical basis in between.
They divided Europe into those spheres of influence, resulting in Germans taking over parts of Poland, Soviet Union taking over Baltics, parts of Poland, Bessarabia, areas such as those given to it in the pact.
It literally isn’t, your whole argument was that it’s not literal, it’s actual code
The division isn’t some code. You can read the English language translation here: https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/addsepro.asp