• errer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    Despite the “official” coding score for GPT5 being higher, Claude sonnet still seems to blow it out of the water. That seems to suggest they are training to the test and the test must not be a very good test. Or they are lying.

        • Elvith Ma'for@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Now that we have vibe coding and all programmers have been sacked, they’re apparently trying out vibe presenting and vibe graphing. Management watch out, you’re obviously next!

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Problem with the “benchmarks” is Goodhart’s Law: one a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measurement.

      The AI companies obsession with these tests cause them to maniacly train on them, making then better at those tests, but that doesn’t necessarily map to actual real world usefulness. Occasionally you’ll see a guy that interviews well, but it’s petty useless in general on the job. LLMs are basically those all the time, but at least useful because they are cheap and fast enough to be worth it for super easy bits.