Yeah we would, it’s the end product not the production that defines it. Same way we refer to cars as cars even tho there’s been robots building them for decades.
I understand we would. I just left a shower thought on the possibility that an entity, if exists, called God would. Not trying to be pedantic here, just an amusing thought. 🙂
Yeah we would, it’s the end product not the production that defines it. Same way we refer to cars as cars even tho there’s been robots building them for decades.
I understand we would. I just left a shower thought on the possibility that an entity, if exists, called God would. Not trying to be pedantic here, just an amusing thought. 🙂
That point quickly devolves into “What would a hypothetical being that’s completely different from us and not knowable do?”
Or to put it differently: “What would something we can’t understand be like?”
It’s kind of a moot question to ask since the question already defines that there is no answer.
Interesting. Yes we are reducing the not knowable to knowable, which is moot.
Sall good, I was just stoned replying.