Let me clear the air a little bit him and my mom live in Baxter County AR, I am stationed in NY. He goes to his so called dealer to get a dimebag well he didn’t know the DEA was trying to take the dealer down. DEA says cooperate and we will drop everything. Long story short the dealer is still active and my bro has his face plastered on the NET. FOR A FREAKING DIMEBAG. So my other brother who is a lawyer I left a cpl messages with no answer yet. Oh it was a dimebag of pot…don’t know anything else that comes that way. I saw his pic and he was released and it just got me wondering what website can gain of a dimebag and getting charged with possession with inten to deliver?

  • Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    wtf, where do you live? Is it a police state? How would publicly posting photos of arrested people possibly help with rehabilitation?

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      America probably. Very often people accused of crimes are basically labeled guilty through news media and posting their faces all over.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Quite the opposite. A police state would hide information on who was arrested and under what charges. This is one of the painful bits of living in a democracy.

      Are public mugshots necessary? I can imagine quite a bit of corruption were they withheld. For example, search my common name and you’ll get dozens of hits in just about any sizeable jurisdiction. With my face shown, you know if it’s really me or not.

    • spongebue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Jail rosters are generally public information. I live in a fairly blue state with a lot of prisons (Colorado) and can look up any prisoner in the state system online.

      Part of the thinking is that if it were secretive, the government could just disappear people (rightfully a concern with ICE right now) without anyone knowing.

      • howrar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I don’t see how it prevents anyone from getting disappeared. All they have to do is not add them to the database.

    • KittenBiscuits@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It doesn’t. The naming and shaming is claimed to be a deterrent. But the juicy gossip is too loved by the law-abiding folk for the elected Sheriff to consider not doing it.