cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/52088358
I know the market is ass rn, I’ve been looking for a job since I graduated in November of last year with no luck. Every application I get a response like “you are great, your skills are great, you meet every criteria but we found someone better”. I recently decided to start replying to emails to ask why I wasn’t picked (I reply only to emails that aren’t from no-reply or if the say I can ask for feedback). So far I have not even received one reply. Am I wasting my time??? I feel like it’s just from automated systems and they don’t even look at it. Is everything literally a ghost job?? If you have ever asked for feedback have you gotten anything useful from it?
Why should I when you contradict your own post:
And then:
And “used to” is incorrect. AI is still a parent term.
Alas, 2 seconds of searching has a Forbes article with links to HR tools built around LLMs: https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2024/12/17/16-essential-generative-ai-tools-transforming-hr-in-2025/
But maybe I’m arguing with a bot anyway.
Are you sure you read the article? It serves my point that HR uses Ai and other than one software suite adding a chat bot for administration, none of it is inference LLMs.
Yes, I have. The very first one on the list sells their own HR LLM, and uses others.
https://blog.leena.ai/worklm-by-leena-ai/
And they’ve integrated LLMs with other tools HR uses since ChatGPT started getting popular, too.
https://intellyx.com/2023/07/25/leena-ai-llm-based-virtual-assistant-with-proactive-capabilities/
And, personal experience as a hiring manager being given tools that were LLM based.