They shouldn’t be able to do that!

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      50 minutes ago

      Yeah, by blocking them you are saying YOU don’t want to see their posts. That doesn’t mean you get to make that decision for everyone else. I don’t see the problem here.

    • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      A block should also be able to prevent them from seeing your activity. That would not constitute silencing the blocked individual as they can still go anywhere and talk to/see anyone else on the fediverse, just not you.

    • smnwcj@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I think communicating that someone is blocked is a useful part of blocking. Even if it’s just a notification after comment “you have a blocked reply, it will not be visible to the poster”.

      • rhombus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Someone else in this thread pointed out that this would just encourage bad actors to make sock puppet accounts to get around being blocked.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I could see someone being frustrated that from a third party, it looks like you are not responding to a reply and that person could spin that as a concession that they were right

      I could see a compromise, where a direct reply from such a blocked/muted person is allowed, but indicated so that people are aware a response could not have been done.