ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 14 days agoPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comexternal-linkmessage-square133linkfedilinkarrow-up1518arrow-down19file-textcross-posted to: world@lemmy.world
arrow-up1509arrow-down1external-linkPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 14 days agomessage-square133linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: world@lemmy.world
minus-squareKintarian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·14 days agoI’d like to go to one of their houses and tell them I want to search the place. After all, they shouldn’t mind if they have nothing to hide, right?
minus-squareDigit@lemmy.wtflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·13 days agoProbably a bluff. I’m sure they’d not want you to find their dungeon, or evidence of their corruption and bribery. [Edit: nor just all the usual parts of privacy and data integrity.]
I’d like to go to one of their houses and tell them I want to search the place. After all, they shouldn’t mind if they have nothing to hide, right?
Probably a bluff.
I’m sure they’d not want you to find their dungeon, or evidence of their corruption and bribery.
[Edit: nor just all the usual parts of privacy and data integrity.]