• pfried@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Passport revocation means nothing in this case. He left Hong Kong after his passport was revoked because China didn’t want him. He couldn’t leave Russia because Putin wanted him.

      • pfried@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        That dude has a history of not understanding what is going on. The only thing the passport revocation did was give Russia an additional excuse to tell him to keep him in the airport instead of allowing him to meet people outside the airport while they figured out what to do with him. They could have let him out of the airport or onto an airplane at any time. There is no requirement for travel documents to deport someone from your country.

        • parzival@lemmy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          Obviously, but they couldn’t have technically (important word here) held him there without the revocation

          • pfried@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            Yes, they could. As soon as he landed in Russia, he was under Russian jurisdiction. There is a legal fiction that he doesn’t have to go through immigration, so he doesn’t need a visa, but Russian law still applies to him, and he can be detained for questioning without charge indefinitely under Russian law. This happens so frequently that it happened just yesterday. https://www.jpost.com/international/article-893628