But would she have lost more votes from people with money than she wouldn’t have lost from the average voter had she not pivoted? Given that people with enough money to be called wealthy are the minority, I don’t believe so.
She wasn’t a good candidate in 2020 and wasn’t better in 2024.
She COULD have won if Biden had stepped down in 2022 and let her run as the incumbent president, or if Biden had decided not to run early enough to run a proper primary and she survived the primary process.
Giving her only 100 days and blocking her from running down Biden doomed her candidacy.
All that financial backing didn’t help her win. She would rather lose the election than lose a source of money.
She would have lost harder without it.
Would she? What part of the money she received made her pivot to the right more palatable to the average voter?
It was never about the average voter, it was all about appealing to the people with the money.
But would she have lost more votes from people with money than she wouldn’t have lost from the average voter had she not pivoted? Given that people with enough money to be called wealthy are the minority, I don’t believe so.
Again, it wasn’t about voters, it was all about money.
We were talking about her losing the election. That’s about voters, not money.
Correct, and you attract voters by spending millions of dollars. The money comes first.
And my point stands, she lost more voters taking the money than she gained.
Then she never had a chance. And the DNC fucked up hard by putting her forward.
Correct!
She wasn’t a good candidate in 2020 and wasn’t better in 2024.
She COULD have won if Biden had stepped down in 2022 and let her run as the incumbent president, or if Biden had decided not to run early enough to run a proper primary and she survived the primary process.
Giving her only 100 days and blocking her from running down Biden doomed her candidacy.