Yes I know the cliche saying of “every president is war criminal” blah blah blah. But last president atleast were attacked or provoked by recognized threat. Trump has -

  • Tried to coup the US government over election results
  • Sent ICE agents into cities to harass the public
  • Defended ICE killing civilians by labeling victims as “domestic terrorist”
  • Bombed Nigeria on Christmas 2025 (it’s unknown the casualty count), Nigeria did not attack us
  • Illegally invaded Venezuela and kidnapped their leader and his wife, Venezuela did not attack us
  • Is currently starving the country of Cuba with no food, electricity or aid, Cuba did not attack us
  • Is spreading false information about White Genocide in South Africa
  • Killed Iranian Generals in his first term after tearing up Obama’s Iran Peace Deal
  • Bombed a school of little girls in Iran
  • Started a war with Iran, killing their leader, Iran did not attack us
  • Wants to occupy and takeover Greenland, Greenland did not attack us or ask for this
  • Inplements unprofessional and nonsensical tariffs on the Global economy

And so much more. Why dosent social media, traditional media, reddit, lemmy, democrats, ANYBODY ever call this gu ya terrorist. No other president has caused this much global terror in the modern era.

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    A terrorist is someone who uses violence to change government policy, if you are the government then by definition you can’t be a domestic terrorist.

    The correct charge is treason, but I imagine getting a conviction for that would be difficult? I’m not familiar with the American legal system. The last time England charged a head of state with treason it was because he started two civil wars.

    • Natanael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      In a multibranch government then yes you can because Trump is threatening judges and more

        • Gnergy@piefed.europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          The problem with that is that he hasn’t been convicted of any of the things mentioned there. People are innocent until proven guilty, so it can’t be the case that someone can be deemed to have done these things if they haven’t been convicted.