I remember when TPM modules and BitLocker became standard, starting with laptops. I always suspected Microslop of adding a yet-to-be-discovered back door in their closed source shitshow.

Must be what a pepper feels like when the first nuke drops.

  • orclev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It’s long been suspected that both Intels and AMDs flavors of system management engine have backdoors built into them and they run at ring -1 (supposedly at least the Intel one runs a flavor of Minix).

    • keimevo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 hours ago

      At least the AMD system management requires physical access (the AMD PSP does not have a network stack). Intel ME / AMT does have a network stack, and it hides its packets inside the host traffic. That’s the reason of the black holes on many Intel CPUs when listening on ports 16992-16995 (the host does not see incoming traffic to those ports because the AMT intercepts it).

        • zwerg@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Surely the traffic is blocked? The firewall in your router can’t know if they came from your CPU OE something else