• Canaconda@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Obviously not but wtf are they gonna do about it? They can’t reign in a senile clown. As if they’re gonna do anything California or New York gives a fuck about at this point.

    • Asafum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      What are they going to do?

      “Corporations are people as per already established rulings.”

      “Political contributions are considered speech as per already established rulings.”

      “Hawaii is taking away poor poor corporations right to free speech under the first amendment, therefore it’s unconstitutional and will be made null and void. Have fun shoveling money at your chosen candidates corporations! Don’t forget my paycheck!”

        • Asafum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not sure what the downvotes are for unless they just don’t like having a video as a response.

          I’m a bit confused on the language because he says the state the corporation was created in give them their rights, so wouldn’t any corporation not from that state be able to spend anyway?