• dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Elections are not the defining trait of democracies. Technically they are not even a requirement. This is why plenty of autocracies can actually have a ton of elections.

      • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Elections are not the defining trait of democracies

        Obviously, he meant free and fair elections, not show ones in dictatorships. Legitimate elections define democracy.

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I agree, but again. Elections are not even technically required. There are democratic decision making structures that don’t rely on election of representatives or voting. Specially on direct democracies, it’s but one of the many ways to ensure the prevalence of democratic values.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Oh, we’ll have elections.

      They are just trying to decide how convincing they can get away with making it look like a free and fair election without letting it actually be free and fair.

      Putin for example has decided that 88% support is “close enough” to a free and fair election… for now.

      • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        how convincing they can get away with making it look like a free and fair election

        I believe all elections in the US going forward will be putin style elections, the rethugs will just issue a decree that the supreme leader won again and this time he going 95% of the votes. All hail king turd