Ideally the answers aren’t just political soapboxing.

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Tomatoes are both a fruit (botanically) and a vegetable (culinarily). “Vegetable” doesn’t have a botanical definition, so the old aphorism about tomatoes “not being a vegetable” is trying to conflate terms from two different domains and hoping you don’t notice.

    • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      And a large number of “fruits” aren’t even a fruit. We’re kinda bad at naming things sometimes

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        A large number of culinary fruits aren’t even botanical fruits, yes. Most of them are botanical berries (and some things that aren’t botanical berries are still culinary berries). Conflating the two linguistic domains causes lots of problems!