• D1re_W0lf@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    13 hours ago

    It’s indeed an OnlyOffice fork. I guess they want to play safe, considering that OO is Russian based.

      • sandwichsaregood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        9 hours ago

        OO is significantly closer to MS office UI wise. As to why they forked it, OO was basically only open source on paper and didn’t really accept external contributions. They tried to shut down this fork with some dubious legal claims that are blatantly in conflict with at least the spirit of the open source license as icing on the cake.

        • flyos@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It’s not just UI wise.

          They explain it on their website : their internal logic for a document is based on OOXML logic, while LO is rather based on a ODT-based logic. So compatibility with Office is more straightforward in OO (though we know Microsoft is not quite exactly following the OOXML norm, so still not perfect…)

          • FarraigePlaisteaċ (sé/é)@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 minutes ago

            Is one project clearly more important than the other these days? Given the gargantuan effort that goes into these suites I’m surprised we can talk about two of them credibly and in the context of open source.