• spock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Does Argentina belong to the Spanish? Why do you think Argentina should take them? Who lived in Argentina before the Spanish came? Who lived in the Falkland islands, nobody.

      • VoteNixon2016@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        It doesn’t matter who lived there first, because I’ll swear on the King’s life that the Brits weren’t first

        Also, “who lived in Argentina before the Spanish came?” Maybe the people living there tens of thousands of years before European colonialism hit their shores?

      • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Let’s recap islands history:

        Deserted, no permanent population.

        French set up a settlement.

        English makes another, fight the French.

        Spain buys French port, fights British.

        Britain leaves.

        Spain leaves.

        Deserted, no permanent population.

        Argentina sets up a settlement.

        England comes back, fight them off.

        Conclusion: “rightfully British”? The law seems to be whoever smacks the other in the teeth and takes it by force, so I suppose that’s accurate.

        However, having had a settlement in the island, Argentina’s claim is as valid as the UKs, and they just got smacked in the teeth so my verdict is that Argentina takes over administrative control over the Islands up until such time as they meet again in a world cup.

        • Starya67@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          You’ve still not explained why Argentina should be allowed to colonise it and Britain shouldnt.

          • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            By all the same arguments that you could invoke to justify British colonization in the first place, assuming you’re not going for bullshit like “god gave our King that holy right”.

          • VoteNixon2016@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            13 days ago

            No one should colonise anything. But the difference between Argentina and The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (God save the King) is as vast as, well, the distance between London and any point in South America

      • BillCheddar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Because “sail around the world and claim what you want” is fucking great if you’re playing Monopoly. Less great to sort out world affairs in a modern world.

        • Natanael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          But if the islands were empty before? Like there’s islands who have thousands of years of history of people living there. But then there’s also those who just doesn’t. Are they supposed to stay empty? All humans always bad, or something?

          • pipi1234@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            13 days ago

            There weren’t empty at the time of the British invasion.

            There was an Argentinian settlement with a governor and a military garrison.