Though I do think that it’s worth remembering that this discussion is about code analysis tools, not code generation tools. The choices don’t look particular great, considering that malicious actors won’t have any qualms about using AI tools to discover exploits.
This is actually eye-opening. One problem I have is: the sponsors of LF basically own Linux and control it? Linus doesn’t have any of his own personal opinions on top of that?
If that’s really true, then what is even the point of having a ‘Linux Foundation’? Because I’m like 99% sure Linux as a whole won’t ever have a lack of sponsors.
Context: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/CAHk-=wi4zC+Ze8e+p3tMv8TtG_80KzsZ1syL9anBtmEh5Z40vg@mail.gmail.com/
Damn, things are heating up. This one is definitely worth a read, and it sounds like a goodbye, considering that this attitude surely isn’t compatible with a longterm continued work relationship: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20260716112048.2dc10a3f@hermes.development.it/
Though I do think that it’s worth remembering that this discussion is about code analysis tools, not code generation tools. The choices don’t look particular great, considering that malicious actors won’t have any qualms about using AI tools to discover exploits.
This is actually eye-opening. One problem I have is: the sponsors of LF basically own Linux and control it? Linus doesn’t have any of his own personal opinions on top of that?
If that’s really true, then what is even the point of having a ‘Linux Foundation’? Because I’m like 99% sure Linux as a whole won’t ever have a lack of sponsors.
If not corruption, why corruption-shaped?