With AI becoming increasingly integrated into “white-collar” industries, raising fears of mass job cuts, there have been calls to bring in a so-called universal basic income, or UBI — which pays people for merely existing.

However, Eberstadt warns that this would only worsen the number of dropouts in American society.

“Disruptive technologies in the past have been really great for people who have had skills,” he said. “Their productivity and incomes have gone up a lot.

“They’ve also displaced a lot of labor for people who don’t have skills. It looks like we’re going to be on that same track with AI, wherever it goes in the next 18 months or 10 years,” Eberstadt said.

“When Henry Ford came down the road, I don’t think that anybody had any idea what a combustion engine was going to do in mass-produced cars,” he said.

"But I would not like to see a guaranteed income, a UBI. Because I look at how men who are neither working nor looking for work say that they are spending their days now. And it is very depressing to see what they say they are doing. And I wouldn’t like us to be buying more of that,” he said.

“They are not engaged in civil society, not helping out around the house, not getting out of the house. Spending 2,000 hours a year in front of a screen. That’s a great warm-up act for becoming a statistic in deaths of despair,” he said.

This is basically a third of our population

  • fonix232@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    This has to be brain-dead behaviour…

    First you create a situation that reduces employment of even the skilled.

    Then in the same breath you complain about people not working, fully aware that you’re the reason they’re not working, not the fact that they’re lazy, but you still try to tell them that they’re lazy?

    I fucking hate this reality we’re in, but the worst part is that chuds will suck up this explanation, EVEN WHEN THEY’RE DIRECTLY AFFECTED BY IT, and keep voting against their own interest.