Every fight for more rights for more people has had this tension.
I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action”; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a “more convenient season.” Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.
Ah yes. A trans woman getting angry that her existence is hanging in the balance, is remotely equivalent to the violence of the system and oppressors on the trans women.
You’re the one assuming violence. All this post mentions is anger being seen as coming from “socialized male violence.” Are you saying that us getting angry is tantamount to us getting violent, or do you just want to shove your own self righteousness into a conversation where it doesn’t belong?
On one hand sometimes yes you have to use violence to gain peace which sucks but is what it is, and on the other hand when I’m out there I’m not fighting in the name of peace I’m fighting for my rights as a human.
How do you achieve peace while someone is running around shooting anyone they see? They will not listen to you. They will not tire or get bored. They will never stop.
How do you, oh wise one, propose we deal with such a situation, if violence is always wrong?
No. I was just shortening your response. If you want the best move, read Stranger in a Strange Land by Robert Anson Heinlein. There’s an infinite complex more dimensions to cognate that way and the author is…well…uh…knot…or…hmm…hard to spell it out but, yeah.
What the fuck is reality?> Ever do the pure logic on that? That is so simple you only get distracted by imagination. At least he’s not far from there.
Cause violence solves violence all in the name of peace.
Every fight for more rights for more people has had this tension.
– MLK
Ah yes. A trans woman getting angry that her existence is hanging in the balance, is remotely equivalent to the violence of the system and oppressors on the trans women.
You’re the one assuming violence. All this post mentions is anger being seen as coming from “socialized male violence.” Are you saying that us getting angry is tantamount to us getting violent, or do you just want to shove your own self righteousness into a conversation where it doesn’t belong?
On one hand sometimes yes you have to use violence to gain peace which sucks but is what it is, and on the other hand when I’m out there I’m not fighting in the name of peace I’m fighting for my rights as a human.
How do you achieve peace while someone is running around shooting anyone they see? They will not listen to you. They will not tire or get bored. They will never stop.
How do you, oh wise one, propose we deal with such a situation, if violence is always wrong?
You’re not familiar with the Tolerance Paradox?
Quite aware. What about it?
No. I was just shortening your response. If you want the best move, read Stranger in a Strange Land by Robert Anson Heinlein. There’s an infinite complex more dimensions to cognate that way and the author is…well…uh…knot…or…hmm…hard to spell it out but, yeah.
What the fuck is reality?> Ever do the pure logic on that? That is so simple you only get distracted by imagination. At least he’s not far from there.