It’s all in the title :) Personnally, i’d say my old Cisco Catalyst 2960. Totally EOL but it’s my first managed switch.

  • B0rax@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 days ago

    The fact that it is a 3-node proxmox cluster with high availability. When one node fails, the other two pick up all the services the failed node took with it.

    And it is all in a 10inch rack.

    • yo_scottie_oh@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      So w/ a three-node cluster, while all three are healthy does it use all three nodes like a load balancer type deal, or is there a primary node that does all the work while the other two nodes are basically chillin’ until the primary node fails?

      • B0rax@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Usually (as in, when not configured otherwise), all 3 nodes are equal and the containers and vms are load balanced across all of them.

        You can however set priorities for each container or vm, you can also set affinity or avoidance rules if some containers should run on the same node or not.

        So both is possible.

        I have them set up to load balance dynamically.