He is a person so, you’re wrong. Also not everyone agrees with your bias, especially when you include the appropriate context: “Does Israel have a right to exist as a state that inflicts collective violence and murder on unprecedented scales against a large segment of their population based on ideology and skin tone without consequence?”. Does Isreal have a right to exist? As much as any other state, and NO state has a right to exist if that existence is centered on violent expansionism, bigotry and genocide. This is akin to how nobody asks if Israel is anti-Islamic, we’re being fed carefully curated narratives to avoid the follow-up, and to that effect I’ll ask you: Does Palestine have a right to exist as an independent state and defend itself against foreing aggression? If not, why?
I agree, yet people are constantly asked if Israel has a right to ‘defend’ itslef when referring to precisely that behaviour in our biased legacy media, and then don’t blink when confronted with video evidence of the IDF bombing groups of unarmed civilians with thermobaric weaponry… Or refuse to acknowledge that throwing rocks in the face of sniper fire is met with improsonment, sexual torture using trained dogs, and death. I just don’t see how anyone can point the finger anywhere else when committing to those actions, and I’ll be first to stress the fact that terror attacks by groups like Hamas are not justifiable, either. They’re just not baseless or irrational, that too is self-defense, and every aggressive action whether in Gaza, Lebanon, or Syria by the IDF is GOING to result in more of this, and the leadership knows that. People have to call out their disingenuous assertions that somehow this is unexpected or unreasonable, and that because of an iredeemable suffering inflicted 70 years ago they should be allowed to inflict the same on other people without question.
People can believe what they want, but I just have to reject that status quo on humanitarian grounds, and it’s not negotiable. I’m not going to passively observe someone who is knowingly or otherwise enabling the narratives that pave the way for more of these actions.
People would answer “yes of course, why do you ask such a weird question”. He didnt answer like this for a reason.
Its a loyalty test question.
He is a person so, you’re wrong. Also not everyone agrees with your bias, especially when you include the appropriate context: “Does Israel have a right to exist as a state that inflicts collective violence and murder on unprecedented scales against a large segment of their population based on ideology and skin tone without consequence?”. Does Isreal have a right to exist? As much as any other state, and NO state has a right to exist if that existence is centered on violent expansionism, bigotry and genocide. This is akin to how nobody asks if Israel is anti-Islamic, we’re being fed carefully curated narratives to avoid the follow-up, and to that effect I’ll ask you: Does Palestine have a right to exist as an independent state and defend itself against foreing aggression? If not, why?
Not in a rapemurder civillians style. This can not be seen as defensive action.
I agree, yet people are constantly asked if Israel has a right to ‘defend’ itslef when referring to precisely that behaviour in our biased legacy media, and then don’t blink when confronted with video evidence of the IDF bombing groups of unarmed civilians with thermobaric weaponry… Or refuse to acknowledge that throwing rocks in the face of sniper fire is met with improsonment, sexual torture using trained dogs, and death. I just don’t see how anyone can point the finger anywhere else when committing to those actions, and I’ll be first to stress the fact that terror attacks by groups like Hamas are not justifiable, either. They’re just not baseless or irrational, that too is self-defense, and every aggressive action whether in Gaza, Lebanon, or Syria by the IDF is GOING to result in more of this, and the leadership knows that. People have to call out their disingenuous assertions that somehow this is unexpected or unreasonable, and that because of an iredeemable suffering inflicted 70 years ago they should be allowed to inflict the same on other people without question.
People can believe what they want, but I just have to reject that status quo on humanitarian grounds, and it’s not negotiable. I’m not going to passively observe someone who is knowingly or otherwise enabling the narratives that pave the way for more of these actions.