Do you mean the literal belief-level acceptance of factual statements or emotional assessments (of the world without the viewer) that are wrong or worse than the world is, or something about how much agency the viewer has or where they should use it?
I mean that YouTube regularly defines information as too dangerous to exist and wipes it from existence. This is followed by nobody batting an eye and nobody leaving YouTube.
Do you mean the literal belief-level acceptance of factual statements or emotional assessments (of the world without the viewer) that are wrong or worse than the world is, or something about how much agency the viewer has or where they should use it?
I mean that YouTube regularly defines information as too dangerous to exist and wipes it from existence. This is followed by nobody batting an eye and nobody leaving YouTube.