• Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Bombing humans is a war crime.

      Bombs are supposed to be used to destroy the infrastructure that their military depends on.

      Once you’re bombing to reduce population, you’re also doing what Sun Tzu says is an absolute last resort, and should be ashamed of your skills as a commander.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Okay yeah, that makes sense. But bombing bridges is also a war crime though? Sounds a lot to me like bridges are “the infrastructure that their military depends on”. Am I thinking about this wrong? 😅

        • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          9 hours ago

          If the bridges are in the theater, then yes. In fact they become strategic hot points and bombing them can be important.

          But in the case of Iran, it was entirely air, missiles and drones, and so the US was hitting bridges just to inconvenience the civilians.

          Granted, if the US invaded with troops and mechanized armor, then those bridges would be useful as the front line advanced, but we have improvised pontoon bridges for that.

          • Victor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Makes sense, thanks. I think every war action that is technically a war crime should be reported as such in the media. Why are the media so slack on this? Like even independent media.

            This would open people’s eyes a little more, I would hope.

    • ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      21 hours ago

      If you don’t let us bomb humans, how are we supposed to do war!?

      • some world leaders, probably.