• ルルㇲ@retrofed.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      4 days ago

      the cool thing about piefed&pylova, is that I read both your unedited undeleted comments.

      If a Journal make the mistake giving attention to a scammer, why does a threadie have to attend to the Journal’s mistake.

      Did you just came off internet class or something? I am just another crossposter. @inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world was the first to give the scammer a 🔁.

      I did tell @redacted@infosec.pub who a is supposed to address, if a really wants to correct the Journal’s mistake. Everyone else that upranked a’s comment can do so as well.

      But yes, you can absolutely comment something addressing me, that I did. Otherwise I wouldn’t have left the «🔔Notify about replies» enabled.

        • ルルㇲ@retrofed.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Because I replied to your tomfoolery?
          Or because you fear the consequences of libeling me responsible for a Jornal‘s mistake?

          • qarbone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            I’m not trying to bully you or bandwagon you, into not posting.

            But you have to acknowledge your own free will. No one made you crosspost this. And no one is preventing you from addressing concerns with the leaker’s motives in whatever way you deem fit: be that deleting the post or editing the OP to include those concerns.

            Saying the equivalent of “someone else messed up, so it’s fine if I don’t clean up” is a shiftless ideology. It is neither a good nor a popular position to debate from.