In my understanding, the “cease and desist” letter from χwitter against XCancel and Nitter is a warning to stop copyright infringement based on US-Law. The US-Law has no effect on most parts of the world. Why cant we just ignore it altogether? I understand that it will be problematic for US- Citizen but everyone else just have to obey their own countries jurisdiction.

Is there a point in the Internets infrastructure that the USA has enough leverage on to stop it anyway? Or am i downplaying the Influence of US Law on judicial decisions in other countries?

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    The harmonisation does not mean much.

    The Us copyright counts if the new company is doing business in Usa (regardless where the company is).

    If they do not care about any users from there, and do not take money from there (for example from ads) they can show them the finger.

    • slazer2au@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Until you remember ICANN is a US org and will give your domain to whomever a judge tells them to, or your CDN disabling your services, or your VM host, crashHub is owned by M$ so they will comply with a takedown of a repo.

      “I’m not in the US it doesn’t effect me” makes as much sense as “I don’t care about privacy, I have nothing to hide”

      • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        “I’m not in the US it doesn’t effect me”

        That’s not what I said.
        It is about your doing business there, or not.

    • Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      If they do not care about any users from there, and do not take money from there (for example from ads) they can show them the finger.

      What’s the basis for this? (More specifically: is this from a specific jurisdiction?)

      • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        What’s the basis for this?

        The simple principle that a country’s law is in force in this country, while in another country it is that other country’s law. It is also called sovereignty.

        • bedwyr@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          The US doesn’t respect sovereignty. Hence our sanctions regimes, embargoes, and charging people that have never been to the united states or done business with it with crimes and extraditing them. Ie, people for drugs in latin america that never did business with americans.

          • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            The US doesn’t respect sovereignty.

            That doesn’t change the principle of sovereignty.
            Usa has yet to learn.