• red_tomato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    142
    ·
    2 days ago

    The global economy is probably already dependent on some Claude code instance updating an Excel spreadsheet on someone’s laptop with a note ”don’t close the lid!” attached to it

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      2 days ago

      When I was a teenager I used to work at an airport and they had critical infrastructure running on things like Basic and Assembly, to transfer data between the computers and modern systems you have to use floppy disks because the computers that they ran on didn’t have drivers to support USB and we couldn’t upgrade the computers because the software wouldn’t work on any other hardware.

      So the AI laptop will be at home amongst all the ancient but supercritical junk that seems to be necessary to run our world.

      • dubs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        At a previous job, I had to build laptops that would multi-boot DOS, Win95, Win98, and XP, all on one laptop. Our field-tech’s software had to have those specific versions of windows for the machines that they serviced, because of how the software interacted with USB and embeded floppy drives.

        If you want to scare yourself:

        spoiler

        They serviced Medical devices: X-rays, MRIs, CT-Scanners, etc.

        • Lantsu@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Honestly, I’d prefer those medical device run on older software than even Win10 lol

        • odelik@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Proton would be over the top unless they’re using graphics APIs or other common gaming related libraries.

          That said, Wine/Bottles would be a possible solution. But so is a VM that runs the software in it’s native environment with pass through ports or even port device/emulation.

          Linux /POSIX is great, but its not always the right solution.

      • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s dumb. The “work” in maintaining this excel file was the prompting and overall agent logic. In reality you’d be using something like openrouter and the instant claude “dies” for whatever reason you swap to whatever the freshest AI is. This never becomes ancient, it keeps up with the times.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t know about that the entirety of European airspace was closed early in the year because of a pilot inputed some malformed data and it crashed both the primary and backup system. The backup system just fed the primary systems inputs into it, so that was inevitable.

          • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’m not sure what your point is. Garbage in garbage out, that’s just the law of computers. That would br the pilot’s mistake.

              • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                That’s on you, when using AI you always have a verifier script afterwards, it’s basic common sense. And if a script can’t do it then human, if you’re saving 90% of the time instead of 100% it’s still fine.

                • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  This is a perfect example of why I’ve never used AI and never will.

                  when using AI you always have a verifier script afterwards

                  LOL. Sounds like you’re wasting 110% time here.

                  • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    What a dumb comment. How am I wasting time if it saves time? Adding a small 5% overhead script to be able to save 90% of the original task’s time is not wasting time. Besides, you’re already using pydantic and structured json output anyway so half the veritication is free.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Reminds me of some stupid company maybe a few months ago that had their PRs failing due to copilot being down the dumbasses didn’t build an “if no AI” failsafe into their workflow. And no one knew how to recover it

    • chisel@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I know my work already has reports built by running data through Claude and having it spit out an xls. Though, it’s not quite as integral as the all-important closet laptop.