• Viceversa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    If you’re under the impression that I support Rowling - I’m not. Fuck her.
    I’m protecting the books.

    • Leon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Given that Rowling is still making money and is actively using that money to harm people, you cannot extricate the art from the artist.

      If one want a whimsical world of magic, I’d recommend Terry Pratchett’s Discworld series. If one wants a little darker story about a magical school, I’d recommend the Scholomance series by Naomi Novik.

        • Leon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Pirating Harry Potter media is the only ethical way of consuming it. When I quoted the books here it was from an epub I obtained the same way the big corpos do it.

      • Viceversa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        you cannot extricate the art from the artist.

        Yet you can. The books (plot) themselves don’t become bad because of that.

            • Leon@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              I’m getting pretty tired of this tirade, honestly.

              Rowling’s hateful and bigoted ideology is reflected in the books, it’s right there for anyone to see. You cannot extricate that from the story she tells. The story is bad, because her ideology is bad.

              That’s not to say that there aren’t redeemable moments. Hitler treated most anyone badly, but he was pro animal-rights. I somehow don’t find that redeems him or his works as a whole. Apply the same to Rowling.