‘It’s not a political thing’ Grammy-winning singer said on stage

Kacey Musgraves is facing backlash from some fans after she showed support for immigrant families during a birthday performance.

The Grammy-winning country singer celebrated her 38th birthday on Friday by marking the opening night of her Middle of Nowhere tour in Chicago. At one point during the performance, she paused the show and urged the audience to donate to the Young Center for Immigrant Children’s Rights as her “birthday wish.”

“It’s a wonderful organization, and they help give aid — legal aid — and money to children whose parents have been deported unfairly,” Musgraves said on stage. “It’s not a political thing. It’s just, these kids need help.”

She continued: “They have no guidance and no way to get through this thing without their home base or their parents. So anyway, 50 cents, whatever the hell, I don’t know, whatever you want to do, but that would mean a lot to me. If you don’t want to, that’s totally fine too.”

The plea was met with applause and cheers from her crowd at the United Center. However, once videos of the moment started circulating online, conservative political commentators were quick to unleash their wrath on the “Follow Your Arrow” singer.

    • yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      1·
      6 hours ago

      So in your view, dehumanization is when you correctly point out that humans are literally human, but they lack certain other qualities, such as rationality, goodness, or personhood?

      Do all humans possess these traits then? What in your view is personhood, exactly?

      Personhood is not the right to moral consideration. That is a right of all sentient creatures. So what is it? Have you ever read anything about this before or are you just now discovering the concept?

      • sem@piefed.blahaj.zoneEnglish
        1·
        39 minutes ago

        Dehumanization is the process, practice, or act of denying full humanity in others,[1] along with the cruelty and suffering that accompany it.[2][3][4] It involves perceiving individuals or groups as lacking essential human qualities, such as secondary emotions and mental capacities, thereby placing them outside the bounds of moral concern.[1] In this definition, any act or thought that regards a person as either “other than” or “less than” human constitutes dehumanization.[5][6]

        In his report on the suppression of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising, Jürgen Stroop described Jews resisting deportation to Nazi camps as “bandits”.

        Lynndie England pulling a leash attached to the neck of a prisoner in Abu Ghraib prison, who is forced to crawl on the floor, while Megan Ambuhl watches, 2003.

        Dehumanization can be overt or subtle,[7] and typically manifests in two primary forms: animalistic dehumanization, which denies uniquely human traits like civility, culture, or rationality and likens others to animals;[3] and mechanistic dehumanization, which denies traits of human nature such as warmth, emotion, and individuality, portraying others as objects or machines.[3]

        It has historically facilitated a broad range of harms, from discrimination and social exclusion to slavery,[1] colonization,[8] as well as other crimes against humanity,[1] and is recognized as a significant form of incitement to genocide.[9]

    • yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      1·
      6 hours ago

      Your speciecist definition of “person” whereby every human is automatically entitled to personhood (even Nazis), whereas every elephant or dog is denied personhood (even good ones) seems grossly out of touch with normative and empirical reality.

      1. Not all humans are moral.
      2. Not all humans are rational.
      3. Not all humans are good.

      4. Personhood isn’t automatic. It’s a normative concept with responsibilities and duties.

      5. Therefore, not all humans are people.
      6. They might be rabid, or zombified, psychopathic, or whatever else.

      We. Are. Just. Animals. Some of us are also people, which has nothing to do with morally arbitrary speciation.