A Trump-appointed judge also said Americans have no “constitutional right to truthful information” during a public health crisis.

On Friday, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit against the city of Jackson, Mississippi, which alleged the city knowingly let residents drink lead-contaminated water.

The lawsuit, first filed in 2022, says the contamination violated Jacksonians’ constitutional right to bodily integrity. Donald Trump-appointed judge Kurt Engelhardt disagreed. “The Constitution does not provide redress for every governmental wrongdoing,” Engelhardt said.

“Defendants’ actions allegedly deprived Plaintiffs of clean water and guileless information. These deprivations, while grievous, do not infringe upon any deeply rooted constitutional right.”

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    49 minutes ago

    Ofc not. This colony was founded by literal enslavers. It’s hard to enslave a comfortable population with their basic needs met. No water, no food, no shelter, no healthcare… Instead it’s “freeze peach” and corporate personhood.

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    11 hours ago

    In some parts of the world, people are thinking about UBI.

    In other parts of the world, having safe drinking water is put into question.

  • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Elections have consequences, everyone who stayed home and allowed Trump to be elected to two terms has enabled this.

    I honestly don’t know if the US will actually be able to recover from those 6 (and counting) years, as an Aussie it feels like we’re watching the equivalent of the Fall of Rome in real time.

    That bastard has managed to isolate you from your allies, line his pockets with billions of dollars, nearly bankrupt your country, destroy your military credibility, pollute your water, air & food, roll back your rights, and so much more.

    It will take at least a generation to undo this damage, and I don’t think there’s enough political will to do what would need to be done to arrest this decline.

    You will likely fall into oligarchy, to become another Russia in my lifetime. Just another regional brute, living off the fear and intimidation you were able to impose on your glory years.

      • green_link@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        “old” america is never coming back. it never was. and by ‘old’ i mean like cold war or obama era, not racist sexist 30’s/40’s/50’s america.

        this ‘new’/currrent america might stick around for a bit, but it will be strained. it will get to a point where this new america fully breaks and ceases to exist (full civil war 2) and the country will be broken up. either into 2 new countries or breaking completely and all the states becoming their own country, which will invoke more war as states (and even other countries) fight each other for land and resources.

        ‘mostly’ world paece was amazing while it lasted. but billionairs didn’t make enough money

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        America will never be what it was.

        What it was isn’t as “great” as the stories Americans tell themselves.

        They need to build back better.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      our public utility used to include reports from regular testing in with the bills… they make them available online now (cost saving, it was a specially-printed multi-page insert before), but it’s still public information.

    • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      A water bill is so the treatment plants can continue running at utmost capacity.

      Should that just be tied into municipal taxes? Maybe. You’re not paying for clean water, you’re paying for the system and the people who help keep it clean.

  • cloudshouter@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    15 hours ago

    It shouldn’t have been a “right to safe drinking water”, it’s an assumption of risk issue. The default setting in the US for a few generations is that the tap water is safe to drink. This reeeally smells like a malicious ruling.

  • bobbyfiend@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    It honestly sounds like the judge has a point. The plaintiffs contended that there was a constitutional right. There doesn’t appear to be, in Mississippi.

    • fodor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      That depends if you agree with the Declaration of Independence. Do you think that all men are entitled to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? If you do, then you think that they are entitled to non-poisoned water, or at least for the government to make a reasonable effort to provide said water.

      But look, this is something that’s hard for American court systems to grasp. In the United States when people talk about rights, they typically only think about the Bill of Rights. And that’s a subset of our rights.

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 minutes ago

        Entitled to does not me provided. It means not blocked, or not taken away. You could argue that by not telling the people, that they blocked their right, but that’s a bit of a stretch. Essentially the peolle where always free to buy clean water from the store, or go to some other source.

        If it meant provide… healthcare would be free, as that is part of the pursuit of life.

        What this may be, is fraud. They charged the people for the water. I am sure somewhere in various publications they call it safe. If the levels were higher than some publication with reasonable authority on the subject calls safe, that would be fraud. The article however didn’t go into those details. I suspect that while the levels were considered by many to be unsafe, there probably lacks an authority on the exact levels that are safe. We ran into this with pur school district. They tested and found some levels were higher than typical guidance, but that “official” unsafe levels weren’t present. So they called it safe. Only people who dug into the data realized they were sugar coating it. But they weren’t legally lieing.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yeah this is total bullshit and all, but The Declaration of Independence is not a legally binding document. It’s irrelevant to the situation, unfortunately. You can’t walk into a court and cite the Declaration of Independence as law or precedent.

        I mean, I guess you could, but no judge would take you seriously because that’s not how jurisprudence works in the US.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    20 hours ago

    “Oh look at me, I’m an entitled American. I want water to drink and to not be lied to. Wha Wha Wha”

    You give people this and they’ll start asking for healthcare next instead of just dying in the street with pride.

    Bunch of greedy entitled fucks.