• hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    It’s possible they are going to push the chinese labs to do the same. Doubtful it will happen. So they’ll go back developing AI and pretend nothing happened

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The problem for them could end up being that the economics simply don’t work. If more capable models are more power hungry, then operating them might be too expensive to justify. Or it could be that there are diminishing returns, and they simply can’t make a model that’s significantly better than the current frontier.

    • mofongo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I doubt the Chinese companies will comply, even if they agree on the surface. Whoever releases the most powerful model when the truce ends, will have the advantage. If anything, research and training will continue, releases will slow down.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        18 hours ago

        They have no leverage over Chinese labs, and China has every incentive to continue developing this tech. The only real explanation I see here is that they’re starting to get into diminishing returns territory, investors are getting edgy, and the costs of running this stuff are exploding.