Since 1 September, Austria has banned headscarves for female pupils under 14 at state and private schools. Repeated breaches of the rule could lead to fines of €150 to €800 for parents.

Since the start of the 2026/27 school year on 1 September, female pupils in Austria under the age of 14 have been prohibited from wearing any headscarf at school that “covers the head in line with Islamic traditions.”

Teachers’ representatives say the new rule has generally been implemented calmly and respectfully. At the same time, some schools have reported conflicts and, in some cases, aggressive reactions.

The new law was already controversial before it came into force, with critics questioning whether it was compatible with freedom of religion and the principle of equality.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The idea that banning head scarves is incrementalism towards banning genital mutilation strains credulity

    I didn’t suggest that, you did. You said both things could protect children’s rights. I just pointed out that the fact that some law doesn’t address entirety of a problem doesn’t prove anything about motivations behind it. Many different things influence the scope of laws. Not just the intent of the legislators but also things like popular support, how much would the enforcement cost, is the enforcement possible in practical terms or some undesired consequences of such enforcement.

    • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I question the logic if banning head scarves is higher priority than forced genital mutilation

      • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        In this case priority is a matter of perspective, not logic. Banning circumcision may be more important for you and me but it doesn’t mean it’s the priority for Austrian voters and legislators.

        • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Precisely, and it speaks to the credibility of the human rights basis, leaving simple bigotry as the most probable motive.

          • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            It doesn’t. I already said there are different reasons why some laws are not passed. With circumcision specifically people may not see it as “forced genital mutilation” but as a harmless procedure. It’s a matter of education and cultural thing. I don’t think most of Americans would agree with you on that but that doesn’t make all of them bigots. On top of that people may think it’s not practically enforceable as you will not have police checking baby penises and people can simply take kids to trusted doctors. Headscarf ban is easier to enforce so it could be done as “low hanging fruit” type of thing, even if it’s not top priority. Nothing here proves bigotry the way you think. You’re still basing this only on your opinions about Austrians. You may be 100% right about it but you can’t really prove anything.