destructdisc@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 天前America, exblainlemmy.imagisphe.reimagemessage-square413linkfedilinkarrow-up11.29Karrow-down117
arrow-up11.27Karrow-down1imageAmerica, exblainlemmy.imagisphe.redestructdisc@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 天前message-square413linkfedilink
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·15 小时前 Trains just don’t have the capacity for a 9/11 Not to bring down buildings, but in terms of terrorism they sure do. Any modern 9/11 attempt will be made by cargo jet. So protection against aircraft bringing down buildings is provided by the US airforce, not the TSA.
minus-squareHCSOThrowaway@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 小时前I feel like you said “No” and then agreed with me.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 小时前I agree with your whole statement, but disagree if it is broken up into separate parts. Passenger vector terrorism is equal on trains and planes (and busses to a much lesser extent). This is the TSAs area. Infrastructure damage is much higher on planes, but this also applies to the 10% of flights that are cargo and the TSA has no influence.
minus-squareHCSOThrowaway@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 小时前For whatever reason it’s just not equal in the US as far as I’m aware. Maybe it’s a benefit of a society who thinks trains are lame.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 小时前When the train’s average speed is 50mph and no-one uses them then the target isn’t big enough for large scale terror.
minus-squareHCSOThrowaway@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 小时前Your position is very confusing.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 小时前Sorry. I should have lead with “Yes I agree”. If trains became less lame then the target would be more interesting for terrorists and the TSA might be more likely to set up shop.
Not to bring down buildings, but in terms of terrorism they sure do.
Any modern 9/11 attempt will be made by cargo jet. So protection against aircraft bringing down buildings is provided by the US airforce, not the TSA.
I feel like you said “No” and then agreed with me.
I agree with your whole statement, but disagree if it is broken up into separate parts.
Passenger vector terrorism is equal on trains and planes (and busses to a much lesser extent). This is the TSAs area.
Infrastructure damage is much higher on planes, but this also applies to the 10% of flights that are cargo and the TSA has no influence.
For whatever reason it’s just not equal in the US as far as I’m aware. Maybe it’s a benefit of a society who thinks trains are lame.
When the train’s average speed is 50mph and no-one uses them then the target isn’t big enough for large scale terror.
Your position is very confusing.
Sorry. I should have lead with “Yes I agree”.
If trains became less lame then the target would be more interesting for terrorists and the TSA might be more likely to set up shop.
Probably, yeah.