• SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    A better analogy

    Counting the votes- pepperoni wins.
    There’s a lot of vegetarians but they don’t make up an absolute majority so their needs are ignored.

    Counting the votes at each table- cheese wins, because even the two huge tables want pepperoni, many of the smaller tables are mostly vegetarians who don’t eat pepperoni.
    This is why the electoral college is still relevant- to ensure that urban voters don’t bowl over suburban or rural voters who deserve to have a say in government too.

    Dividing each table into groups then adding them together- that’s a scam by a pepperoni fan because they will ensure every group has 5 known pepperoni lovers and 2 others.

    • Zorg@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Isn’t the House and the Senate already skewed in rural areas favor? Do urban voters really need to be kneecapped all across government?

      • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        That’s the whole point of the House-Senate split- that the more populous urban areas get more representation in the House, but proportionately less in the Senate.

        That said- gerrymandering has fucked that up hardcore. The solution though is to stop gerrymandering, not to give urban areas universal control over the Presidency.

        If you make the Presidency a popular vote only, then candidates will campaign in every major city and won’t give a fuck what rural areas want.

      • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The senate sure is. The house get reapportioned after every census to stay more or less proportional to population differences.