Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, the devout Catholic conservative who has long warned of animus against religion in America, says in a new book that he believes the court’s landmark decision extending marriage rights to same-sex couples was “perhaps the decisive point in our nation’s turn against religious liberty.”

Alito, who dissented sharply in the 2015 case, made the claim at Catholic University of America three years after Obergefell v Hodges in a speech that was not open to the public or widely covered at the time. The remarks were published this month in “So Ordered,” a collection of Alito speeches that he says reflect his judicial philosophy and outlook on the country.

  • Sirdubdee@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Why does the government even have to recognize marriages? It seems like govt overreach to be involved in a religious ceremony. Abolish marriage certificates and just set your partner as your emergency contact.

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Why does the government even have to recognize marriages?

      Property ownership and inheritance (which could be done without marriage, but marriage is such a common pattern that it’s convenient to have it).

    • Tetragrade@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It’s a reverse dominance hierarchy to stop high-status people from forcing low-status people into harems. Marriage abolition is counterintuitively not woke at all, imo.