• butwhyishischinabook@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m sorry but a robot box delivering my food doesn’t make it “slop,” this isn’t like AI at all. The food isn’t worse, or even colder, it’s just being delivered by a robot instead of an underpaid guy on a bike or in a car. Why are we fighting to maintain an extremely exploitative gig economy and tipping culture at the same time? I thought both were bad? I don’t get it.

    • KimLuff@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Nah actually people like you need to take a walk outside lmao in my opinion. These things suck for foot traffic and take jobs from people who often have no other means of survival at all. They are made by weird tech guys who design them for optimizing profit over everything else which should NOT be the case for what is a vehicle in a street

      • butwhyishischinabook@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I literally walk to work every day in an area with a ton of them, they’re less in the way than the average moron abruptly stopping in front of me because they’re more into their phone call than paying attention to the world around them lol.

    • chewypoops@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      “Slop” has been slang for food for longer than it has been slang for AI content. You’re deliberately misinterpreting the headline.

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      The proper solution is to properly pay the delivery person. You shouldn’t replace them with a clanker that doubles as a surveillance drone

      • amorpheus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Serious luddite vibes. These jobs will be lost to automation like so many before them, and we’ll be better off for it.

        • SprkPlug@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Anyone i have seen using the word “luddite” so far has proved themselves to be morons of the highest order. They always conflate rejection of technology to fighting to be replaced by our capitalist overlords

        • chewypoops@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          The Luddites were the good guys, by the way. They were labor activists fighting back against mass-unemployment in a world that didn’t care what happened to workers who lost their livelihood.

          The government response was to make “machine breaking” a capital crime so that they could execute labor activists who dared take direct action.

          Declaring yourself anti-Luddite is just taking the side of the capitalists who would murder workers to protect the machines. That’s not a wise side to be taking today if you’re not a billionaire.

          • amorpheus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Luddite

            • /ˈlʌdʌɪt/

            • A Luddite is someone who opposes new technology, automation, or the modern information age.

            I’m aware of the history and it’s a very apt parallel. At the same time it strikes me as rather futile and misguided to push against progress to save shitty jobs. Worker protections have improved over the 200 years since then, we just need to make sure society keeps moving in the right direction for everyone.

            • Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              We havnt solved world hunger, income inequality, climate change or so many other human social issues… but yes, a robot to deliever food to the wealthiest folks is going to be the future and help everyone!

              • amniotic druid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                You’re right, a person doing that job will totally fill the income inequality gap. That’s the real future of worker emancipation. Up by the bootstraps, one McDonald’s order at a time!

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Then they won’t have a job and no one is hiring. Without a planned economy, people are fucked over by automation.

          • amorpheus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            18 hours ago

            That’s not new. Look at any modern assembly line - should we focus on getting more humans back in there so they can do mind-numbing work eight hours a day?

            We obviously need to put a lot of effort into making society work for everyone. But sticking your head in the sand and refusing progress is counterproductive.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              18 hours ago

              We should focus on planning the economy, and until we can do that, we need to let people keep their jobs.

              The weavers had to be suppressed with the military when the autolooms came for their jobs, now imagine if that’s every job in every sector in every country all at the same time. There is a tipping point where job losses outpace job creation, and then people start picking up guns.

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Serious luddite vibes.

          Found the cog-sucker.

          Dumb fucks like you love to just roll over and let these Big Brother drones eventually track everyone’s movements via facial recognition and use the info to throw dissenters into camps

          • amorpheus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Sure, the delivery bots are the lynchpin in our dystopian surveillance future. If only we could stop them, then nothing else would track us.

      • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        But the ubereats guy is whizzing along footpaths as quick as he dares on an electric bike because hes gotta get back to make more deliveries to survive.

        I live in a tiny town where that doesnt happen, but whenever I go into my local Big City I’m always dodging them, terrified.

      • butwhyishischinabook@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Except they don’t block the road. I live and work in an area with a ton of these things all the time. They usually are annoyingly cautious not to block the road, leading to them sometimes sitting at crosswalks for several cycles. That’s just not true. They don’t even really block the sidewalks even though there are a ton of them.