

Don’t forget that Brazil is one of the few countries that the US has a positive trade imbalance with. The stated goal of the tariffs was always balancing trade, this is explicitly political strong-arming.
FKA
PP_BOY_/GIRL_
NotANaziIWasJustBornIn1988
Mommykink
Don’t forget that Brazil is one of the few countries that the US has a positive trade imbalance with. The stated goal of the tariffs was always balancing trade, this is explicitly political strong-arming.
The immigration offices of literally every country disagrees
It’s about the average temperature of a hot dog at a Braves game. Or 7/16ths the temp a black Ford F350 gets in a Walmart parking lot. Hope this helps.
Objectively false. Water boils at 210°F
Deep breath
Mmm. Smells like the 2010s.
At least its mostly timed exclusives these days.
Had a conversation about this the other day with a coworker, albeit about ICE cars but still applicable I think. Car manufacturers made tremendous progress in effeciency and negated all of that by justifying making their cars 2x bigger than they were 20 years ago. It’s ridiculous. A modern Subaru Outback is about the same size as a mid-90s Suburban. Gets about the same mileage as my 2001 Outback, even with all the effeciency tech
No lol.
How i learned to stop worrying and love the biggest load
No, but it means that the transracial community has some social advocating to do before most people will care one way or another. It wasn’t that long ago that the funniest thing a movie could do was put a man in a dress, y’know.
Counterpoint: what’s at stake in the “transracial validity” debate? It’s important that society addresses transgender injustices because there’s a long history of violence against transfolk. I’ll admit that I’m not super familiar, but I dont see that in the history of transracialism.
Transracial person: “im black”
Bigot: “no youre not”
end scene.
Versus
Transgender person: “I’m a girl”
Bigot: “no youre not”
Cue decades of abuse, oppression, and violence.
It’s just not a big enough concern for most people so their default opinion is the one for the status quo, IMO.
Oh neat, what a nice coincidence to find then. I’m away from my desktop for at least 6 more hours or I would’ve double checked it on my own before making a post
For the most part, yes, at least on a large scale. Proximity to a water source was pretty much a requirement for developments for most of history.
On the smaller side of things, other commenters have already mentioned that we had ways to store water before bottles existed.
They are literally building doomsday bunkers while knowing we’re pretty much heading unavoidably towards cooking the earth alive. The 1% has concentrated more wealth than ever in modern history. They dont care about squeezing a little more money out of us at this point, they’re in their endgame. All that’s left to do is to finish training the AI that’ll be their staff once they seal themselves off and that’s it.
NTA but can you elaborate on this a bit? Never heard someone put this argument before I’m just curious exactly what you mean
Definitely longer than 3 years but yeah. I saw the writing on the wall when I chose a major and realized they’d been pushing “learn to code!” For about 10 years at that point.
Not that deciding to study humanities was any better financially lol, but at least it didn’t pigeonhole me with a hard-skills education
CEO and former moderator of r/jailbait, a Reddit forum made for the sexualization of minors, Steve Huffman, shows that he… knows what a “draft” is
Portal 2 imo. Stephen Marchant makes everything better
Tl;dr: get a passport. If you have a passport, get it out right now. Look at it. Hold it. Is it expired? How many people do you think have a passport but have no idea where it is? Don’t be one of those folk