bsergay@discuss.online to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 months agoAn Initial Benchmark Of Bcachefs vs. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. F2FS vs. XFS On Linux 6.11www.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up1136arrow-down10cross-posted to: linux@lemmy.world
arrow-up1136arrow-down1external-linkAn Initial Benchmark Of Bcachefs vs. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. F2FS vs. XFS On Linux 6.11www.phoronix.combsergay@discuss.online to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square9fedilinkcross-posted to: linux@lemmy.world
minus-squareMagister@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up16·3 months agoBtrfs may have compression on by default so take it with a grain of salt
minus-squaremiss phant@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up22·edit-23 months agoNeither do according to their respective docs. Personally though I would’ve preferred an updated* test with more realistic hardware and zstd compression enabled cause this tested configuration is pretty rare in the real world. * Their last btrfs compression benchmark was on Linux 4.11 in 2017 it seems, on a 120 GB Sata SSD.
minus-squareSkull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-22 months ago[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
Btrfs may have compression on by default so take it with a grain of salt
Doesn’t Bcachefs, a well?
Neither do according to their respective docs.
Personally though I would’ve preferred an updated* test with more realistic hardware and zstd compression enabled cause this tested configuration is pretty rare in the real world.
* Their last btrfs compression benchmark was on Linux 4.11 in 2017 it seems, on a 120 GB Sata SSD.
[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]