Lacanoodle@literature.cafe to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 年前Me but ublock originliterature.cafeimagemessage-square172linkfedilinkarrow-up11.74Karrow-down143 cross-posted to: piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
arrow-up11.7Karrow-down1imageMe but ublock originliterature.cafeLacanoodle@literature.cafe to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 年前message-square172linkfedilink cross-posted to: piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
minus-squareKrankyKong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down6·1 年前My unpopular opinion is that YouTube has every right to enforce ads on their platform if you’re not paying for the service.
minus-squareSettoletto 🍤@fed.dyne.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down1·1 年前The service where they crowd sourced 2/3 of their catalogue from “sharecare” pirate bears?
minus-squareEvilschnuff@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down4·1 年前Infrastructure is not free.
minus-squaremrinfinity@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·1 年前Absolutely not our problem. They can come up with other business models. Maybe they can resurrect one of the hundreds of projects/business models from them at https://killedbygoogle.com/ and run with that
minus-squareBedSharkPal@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 年前It’s much cheaper than the money they make on it though. Hence all the profits.
minus-squareKrankyKong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·1 年前Youtube operated at a loss for years
minus-squareZamundaaa@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 年前It hasn’t operated at a loss anymore for years you mean?
minus-squareKrankyKong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 年前You mean when they started playing ads?
minus-squareSettoletto 🍤@fed.dyne.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·1 年前oh, wait, i forgot about all the sharecare non-pirate bears that just upload good stuff for the careshare… you know, that other 3/12 of the catalogue…
minus-squareKrankyKong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·1 年前I’m… at a loss. Can you rephrase these comments please?
minus-squaretrolololol@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 年前My friend is confused too, care to explain to me so I explain to him?
My unpopular opinion is that YouTube has every right to enforce ads on their platform if you’re not paying for the service.
The service where they crowd sourced 2/3 of their catalogue from “sharecare” pirate bears?
Infrastructure is not free.
Absolutely not our problem. They can come up with other business models. Maybe they can resurrect one of the hundreds of projects/business models from them at https://killedbygoogle.com/ and run with that
It’s much cheaper than the money they make on it though. Hence all the profits.
Youtube operated at a loss for years
It hasn’t operated at a loss anymore for years you mean?
You mean when they started playing ads?
oh, wait, i forgot about all the sharecare non-pirate bears that just upload good stuff for the careshare… you know, that other 3/12 of the catalogue…
I’m… at a loss. Can you rephrase these comments please?
My friend is confused too, care to explain to me so I explain to him?