The songs that the AI CEO provided to Smith originally had file names full of randomized numbers and letters such as “n_7a2b2d74-1621-4385-895d-b1e4af78d860.mp3,” the DOJ noted in its detailed press release.

When uploading them to streaming platforms, including Amazon Music, Apple Music, Spotify, and YouTube Music, the man would then change the songs’ names to words like “Zygotes,” “Zygotic,” and “Zyme Bedewing,” whatever that is.

The artist naming convention also followed a somewhat similar pattern, with names ranging from the normal-sounding “Calvin Mann” to head-scratchers like “Calorie Event,” “Calms Scorching,” and “Calypso Xored.”

To manufacture streams for these fake songs, Smith allegedly used bots that stream the songs billions of times without any real person listening. As with similar schemes, the bots’ meaningless streams were ultimately converted to royalty paychecks for the people behind them.

  • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 个月前

    Do you pay them any money to have the songs on the platforms?

    If not, I wonder if they charge you a fee but only deduct their fee from your earnings. So if you don’t get plays then they don’t ask for money. And the break even point is at around 1 million plays. Just a theory of course; I’m sure it’s all stated in the fine print.

    • Underwaterbob@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 个月前

      I pay Distrokid ~$20 a year to distribute my music to a lot of streaming services, but I do not pay individual streaming services. I never really expected much return. I wasn’t disappointed! Haha!

      • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 个月前

        I was just curious about why 4 million plays is ~$20 and 1 million plays is less than a dollar.

        • Underwaterbob@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 个月前

          The best I can figure is that the 4M$20 track was popular on a streaming service that pays better, and vice versa for whatever reason.