buckbanzai@infosec.pub to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前REPORT: Arm is sensationally canceling the license that allowed Qualcomm to make Snapdragon chips which power everything from Microsoft's Copilot+ PCs to Samsung's Galaxy smartphones and tabletswww.windowscentral.comexternal-linkmessage-square196linkfedilinkarrow-up1757arrow-down19
arrow-up1748arrow-down1external-linkREPORT: Arm is sensationally canceling the license that allowed Qualcomm to make Snapdragon chips which power everything from Microsoft's Copilot+ PCs to Samsung's Galaxy smartphones and tabletswww.windowscentral.combuckbanzai@infosec.pub to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square196linkfedilink
minus-squareNeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23arrow-down5·1 年前 Don’t just give the extortionists more money Or maybe they were just trying to pay a lot less money, and then they got caught at their little trick.
minus-squareiopq@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up42arrow-down6·1 年前Do you know how much money you have to pay to make a RISC V chip? Even less than that, since it’s free
minus-squarePetter1@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·1 年前Development is never free, especially, if you have to build new knowhow and can not build upon the one they have built at development of ARM chips.
minus-squaremannycalavera@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·1 年前If it’s that’s easy / cheap then why have they not? This is a big ol’ game of bluff from both sides. So, according to you, Qualcomm should call their bluff?
minus-squareSaltySalamander@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 年前Wonder how long that’d take, hmm?
minus-square418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down6·1 年前By that logic every company would just run on linux. Free to use ≠ free to implement and support.
minus-squareNeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 年前You have not read the article.
Or maybe they were just trying to pay a lot less money, and then they got caught at their little trick.
Do you know how much money you have to pay to make a RISC V chip? Even less than that, since it’s free
Development is never free, especially, if you have to build new knowhow and can not build upon the one they have built at development of ARM chips.
If it’s that’s easy / cheap then why have they not?
This is a big ol’ game of bluff from both sides. So, according to you, Qualcomm should call their bluff?
They would need a new core design
Wonder how long that’d take, hmm?
By that logic every company would just run on linux. Free to use ≠ free to implement and support.
You have not read the article.